Friday, April 17, 2009

Don't Let These Athletes be You!! "Financially"

Worst athletes from whom to ask financial advice
By RealClearSports staff
Apr 15, 8:38 pm EDT

Buzz up!222 votes PrintTurning to your favorite athletes or former sports star for financial advice might seem to make sense – they deal with a lot of numbers and stats all year long – but trust us, they are hardly the ones to seek out.

Blessed with millions of dollars at a young age, professional athletes often seem more concerned with inane spending and unwise investments than savings accounts and 401Ks. And that doesn’t even mention their tax return mistakes, of which there are enough to make Timothy Geithner embarrassed. From fleets of cars to yachts to entourages to even Bengal tigers, the ways some athletes chose to spend their money is comical at best and ignorant at worst.

In August of 2007, a federal marshal seized Latrell Sprewell’s $1.5 million yacht (famously named “Milwaukee’s Best”) after Sprewell had failed to pay his mortgage on the boat. He also lost his house, and now the state of Wisconsin has filed a lawsuit for unpaid taxes. This all, of course, comes after Sprewell turned down a three-year, $21-million contract, saying, “I have a family to feed.”

Some athletes prefer to travel extravagantly by land instead of sea, however. Take former Red Sox slugger Jack Clark, for example. One story says Clark was once on his way to the ballpark for a game when he passed a car lot. Clark saw something he liked and dropped in to buy two sports cars for $90,000 each before continuing on to the game. At the time he filed for bankruptcy, Clark still owed money on 17 of his 18 automobiles.

Clark and Sprewell lost their fortunes in a hurry, but perhaps there’s no faster fall from grace than Michael Vick. In 2006, Sports Illustrated estimated that Vick made $25.4 million. Now, he owes well over $10 million to a variety of different companies. How did Vick go from being one of the highest paid athletes to owing millions? The entourage didn’t help, especially since he was spending about $300,000 a month to support friends and family. But a bigger financial gaffe was entrusting his money to a woman who is now banned from working with any firm that trades on the NYSE because she bilked two old women out of $150,000, and a man who’s been accused of defrauding church members. His finances were such a mess that the bankruptcy judge appointed a trustee to help him out. But don’t feel sorry for Vick just yet – in an effort to pay down his debt, Vick will be selling three of his six homes.

Yachts? Six homes? That’s more luxurious than what most of us get to enjoy, but it’s nothing compared to the spending done by Mike Tyson. He might be the most well-known fighter of his generation, but if there was one thing Tyson was better at than boxing, it was spending money. In 2003, he filed for bankruptcy after his debt reached over $27 million, about half of which was to the IRS. What was he spending all his money on? For starters, two Bengal tigers for $140,000, for which he also had to pay a trainer $125,000 a year. But that was just a drop in the bucket. There was also the $4.5 million he spent on cars, and perhaps the most inane purchase of all, a bathtub for his first wife, Robin Givens, at a cost of $2 million.

While you may look to guys like these for guidance on which sneakers to wear or which car to drive, it’s probably best to leave the financial advising to tax pros, and not pro athletes.


The “top” five:

1. Mike Tyson
2. Latrell Sprewell
3. Michael Vick
4. O.J. Simpson
5. Bjorn Borg

Saturday, March 21, 2009

DIGIWAXX THE BLAST PRESENTS - HOT NEW EVENT MEET ASHER ROTH AND MORE!

UPCOMING NETWORKING EVENT "MECA 360"

TRUNK HUSTLERS SAYS PEEP THESE VIDEOS FROM TOMORROWS CONFERENCE GUEST & CHECK OUT OUR FEATURED VIDEO!



PhotobucketPhotobucket

TRUNK HUSTLERS "RATED NEXT" HIP HOP CONFERENCE CALL PRESENTS... MIMS, FREEWAY, RITA (TRILLOGY), THE CRASH CREW (RSONIST, AMEER, KARTY), ACAFOOL

THIS WEEKS FEATURED GUEST:

MIMS,DIG,CL,HIP HOP,cool v, cool vs rated next, trunkhustlers,
M.I.M.S


JOIN US THIS SUNDAY AT 8:00 PM SHARP E.S.T
Conference call number: 218-339-4600 Access Code: 1088545 #

*PLEASE PRESS *6 TO MUTE YOUR PHONES IF CALLING FROM A NOISY AREA*
*CALL SCHEDULE*

CALL STARTS & INTRO:8:00
MIMS: 8:15
FREEWAY & RITA (TRILLOGY): 8:35
CRASH CREW (RSONIST OF THE HEATMAKERZ, AMEER, KARTY) 9:00
ACAFOOL (FEAT NEW SINGLE RIDE ON FAST & FURIOUS 4): 9:30
NETWORKING: 9:40
CALL ENDS: 10:30

"Please Arrive Early & Bring Pen, Pad & Come Ready To Network!"
MIMS,AD,DIGIWAXX,CL,HIP HOP,cool v, cool vs rated next, trunkhustlers,

"DJ'S, DIGITAL DISTRIBUTORS, RECORD POOLS, MAGS AND ALL "TRUNK HUSTLER MEMBERS" WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT PLEASE DOWNLOAD M.I.M.S NEWEST SINGLE "MOVE" AND ADD TO YOUR PLAYLIST"

JOIN US THIS SUNDAY WHERE M.I.M.S WILL DISCUSS HIS SOPHOMORE ALBUM, NEW VIDEO, NEWS ETC...

Lookout for new album from my boy "M.I.M.S’" titled "GUILT " (*DON'T SLEEP*) MIMS is out to prove he is no one hit wonder and if your wondering that he's out to mos def Show N Prove that he's got SKILLS! Be on the lookout for it beacuse it should be hitting the shelves of stores on April 7th and "LeToya Luckett" who sings on the track "LOVE ROLLER COASTER" (Who may be joining us NEXT Sunday on our R&B conference call) new album,"Lady Love" which will be hitting stores shorty after in May. (So Stay Tuned!!)

DOWNLOAD M.I.M.S NEW SINGLES BY CLICKING THE LINKS BELOW

New Heat: "Love Roller Coaster" Feat Latoya Luckett
DOWNLOAD THE SINGLE BY CLICKING THE LINK BELOW
Song
(CLICK ON LINK ABOVE TO DOWNLOAD)

CHECK OUT NEW EXCLUSIVE VIDEO "Love Roller Coaster" JUST CLICK THE LINK BELOW (Enjoy!)
Video
(CLICK ON LINK ABOVE TO DOWNLOAD)

"MOVE IF YA WANNA" (Radio Version)
Song
(CLICK ON LINK ABOVE AND DOWNLOAD)

CHECK OUT HIS NEW VIDEO "Move If Ya Wanna" JUST CLICK THE LINK BELOW
Video


FOR OUR MIXTAPE HEADS DOWNLOAD HIS NEW JOINT "BIG SHOUTS TO COAST TO COAST" FOR THIS ONE!


CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD OR STREAM THIS MIXTAPE FOR FREE!

CHECK THE TRACK LISTING BELOW:

1. Mims - Invisible Man
2. Sha Stimuli - Coast 2 Coast Weekly 10
3. Jay-Z – My President Is Black (Remix)
4. Nino Bless - Hate In Ya Blood Freestyle
5. Mims - I Brought It Here
6. Joell Ortiz, Joe Budden, Royce Da 5′9” & Crooked I - Move On (Remix)
7. CyMarshall Law - Coast 2 Coast Weekly
8. Rick Ross - Mafia Music
9. Add 2 - Coast 2 Coast Weekly 5
10. Mims - Life Of A Star
11. Miz - R&B Songs
12. Lil Fats - Coast 2 Coast Weekly 22
13. RATheMC, Fred Knuxx, Balance, & Wordsmith-Get Me (Produced by Judah)
14. Ness - Coast 2 Coast Weekly 1
15. Sha Stimuli - Coast 2 Coast Weekly 9
16. J-LP - Stacks
17. Graffix - Spit Game
18. Henok Achido - Fly Fresh
19. LES200 (JAMHAITIAN & L’AUTHENTIK PAYZAN) FT. MAGNUM 357 - Trespass
20. Na’Gee - Do
21. T-Bone - The Goose
22. Mr. Flowas - Dun Know
23. Gambit - Another Planet (Remix)
24. Melodic - Thumpin
25. Kredit - Music Box
26. LIL BYRD of the Infamous Playa family - Call Me Daddy
27. Mims - Outro

MAKE SURE YOU HIT MIMS:

Official Website
Myspace
FaceBook

You Tube
Reverb Page

Twitter
Rhapsody

For Drops, MP3's or Interviews contact: Kasey Woods (Tell Her Cool V Sent Ya!)

NOTE: DJS GOT A HOT MIXTAPE? THEN SHOW US FORWARD THEM TO: TRUNKHUSTLERSMIXTAPES



GOT A HOT NEW TUNE? SUBMIT YOUR MUSIC TO TRUNK HUSTLERS MP3

*PLEASE INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING TRACK INFORMATION*

CLEAN, DIRTY, ACCAPELLA AND INSTRUMENTAL ALSO BE SURE TO INCLUDE NAME OF TRACK,ARTIST(S), PRODUCER(S) BPM, TRACK LENGTH, WEBSITE, BIO/ONE SHEET (WORD FORMAT OR ADOBI FORMAT PREFERRED) IN SUBJECT TITLE INCLUDE ARTIST AND NAME OF SONG. IF YOU EXPECT US TO PLAY IT OR BLAST IT PLEASE INCLUDE VIDEO DROP (SEE DROP SCRIPT BELOW) PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE VIDEO DOWN LOADABLE LINK (SHAREBEE, MEGAUPLOAD, ZSHARE ETC YOUR CHOICE)

GOT ADS? SEND THEM TO TRUNK HUSTLERS ADS
FOR ALL TRUNKHUSTLERS INFO GIVE US A LINK AT TRUNK HUSTLERS INFO

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Less Power to Purchase

Less Power to Purchase
Consumers' Credit Card Limits Slashed as Companies Try to Reduce Risk

By Nancy Trejos
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 16, 2008; Page F01

Cecil Bello has stumbled into a new corner of the credit squeeze. The 32-year-old management consultant has had the limits reduced on three of her credit cards.

In September, U.S. Bank notified the Fairfax County resident that she no longer had a $14,500 limit on a card that had a balance of about $5,000. Her new limit left her just $500 from being maxed out, she said.

Then came an Oct. 26 letter from American Express that said she now had a limit of $14,000, down from $22,000. That letter said her "total debt is too high relative to your payment history with us and other creditors."

Early this month, she received an e-mail from American Express notifying her that another card with a $5,000 limit had been reduced to $3,000 and that her new cash advance limit was down to $200.

Bello said she had made more than the minimum payments on time each month.

"I am taking responsibility for paying off my debt," she said. "But when credit card companies trap people this way, it's almost impossible to dig yourself out of the hole."

Like many other card users, Bello has learned the hard way that credit card companies are increasingly putting the clamps on their customers. Lenders are taking a wide range of steps to mitigate their risk as unemployment rates tick up and the number of delinquent borrowers grows. Besides cutting credit limits, card companies are raising rates and fees, and suspending offers such as zero percent balance transfers. They are also making rewards programs less rewarding and shutting down inactive accounts, industry analysts and watchdogs said.

The retrenchment, which follows years of lavishing Americans with offers and ever-increasing limits, is squeezing consumers at a time when they have already lost other avenues for borrowing, such as home equity lines of credit.

"We've been hearing about the liquidity crisis affecting banks for quite a while. Now we're seeing it transform into a crisis affecting people's personal finances as well," said Joe Ridout, a spokesman for Consumer Action, an advocacy group. "The next wave of the financial crisis may well be a credit-card-related crisis."

The signs of the squeeze on consumers are accumulating. Last spring, Capital One notified customers who had made no transactions in three years or more that their accounts would be closed. On Nov. 1, Discover removed the cap it used to have on balance-transfer fees. Average late fees on all cards have gone up about 10 percent in the past year, according to a review by CardRatings.com.

"What's happening is that everyone is looking at the jobless rate, and there's every indication that joblessness is going to increase well into next year," said David Robertson, publisher of the Nilson Report, a newsletter that monitors the industry. To credit card companies, that means a sharp increase in loans that have to be written off as uncollectable, which are known as charge-offs, he said.

Already, there are signs that consumers are having trouble keeping up with payments. According to Moody's Investors Service, credit card charge-off rates rose 48 percent in August from the same time last year. It was the 20th consecutive year-over-year increase in charge-offs. The ratings agency said it expects the numbers to increase throughout 2009, surpassing levels reached during past recessions.
Delinquency rates are also up. Capital One, for instance, reported that delinquencies jumped to 4.2 percent in the third quarter from 3.85 percent the previous quarter and from 3.8 percent a year ago.

Even lenders who cater to more credit-worthy borrowers have suffered losses. American Express wrote off 5.9 percent of its loans in the third quarter, up from 5.3percent in the second quarter and 3 percent a year ago.

"Cardmember spending is likely to remain soft" into 2009, Kenneth I. Chenault, chairman and chief executive, said in a news release. "Loan growth will be restrained, in part because of the steps we are taking to reduce credit risks, and credit indicators are likely to reflect the continued downturn in the economy and throughout the housing sector."

The numbers have spooked lenders into withholding credit. Major issuers, such as Bank of America, have said they have raised their standards for granting cards. Stephanie Jacobson, first vice president of public affairs for Chase Card Services, said the company has increased its credit-score cutoffs for direct-mail marketing. "As leading indicators began to change in early 2007, we adjusted our risk-management policies and procedures to better manage potential losses," she said.

Fewer consumers are now getting courted. According to Mintel Comperemedia, a marketing research firm, 1.34 billion credit card direct mail offers were sent out in the third quarter, down 13 percent from the previous quarter and 28 percent from a year earlier.

A Federal Reserve survey of lenders, released last week and conducted last month, found that 50 percent had raised their minimum required credit scores over the past three months, which prompts the question: What makes a customer desirable these days?

"This is a moving target because the most credit-worthy a year ago was someone with a 700 FICO score. Now it's more like 730," said Curtis Arnold, founder of CardRatings.com.

Lenders are now increasingly considering factors beyond late or missed payments. Some are looking at geography and shopping behavior as well. If you live in an area with a high foreclosure rate or shop at stores that risky borrowers frequent, don't be surprised if your line is reduced or your rate goes up.

"Among other factors, we do look at mortgage information and geography where there has been a greater deterioration in home prices. Those are some other factors, but again, we're looking at the entire credit profile," Lisa Gonzales, manager of public affairs for American Express, said of credit line reductions.

"We have taken actions such as lowering credit limits, adjusting rates, tightening credit standards and closing inactive accounts, particularly in certain geographies and where we can use mortgage data to enhance our decision-making capabilities," said Jeanette Volpi, vice president of public affairs for Citi.

Reducing credit lines, in particular, has wreaked havoc on many consumers by affecting their debt utilization ratio, which is the percentage of available credit they are using. A high debt utilization can lower a credit score, which then makes it tougher to get credit or at least get credit under favorable terms.

Joanna Fridinger, owner of a limo company in Baltimore, found herself feeling the wrath of American Express. She had a credit limit of $19,500 on a card she had gotten in 2004 and, she said, faithfully paid on time. But a dispute with Macy's over a broken vacuum she bought on credit dinged her credit report. She said she refused to make payments on the vacuum and was hit with a late fee.

In March, American Express slashed her limit to $1,400, she said.

"I was paying over and beyond what they even asked me and that was why I was so shocked that they did this," she said. "I thought, 'What the hell? I've been a good customer. Doesn't that mean anything?' "

Gonzalez of American Express said that in a typical year, fewer than 20 percent of its customers have their lines adjusted. Of that proportion, 80 percent usually have credit increases, while 20 percent have decreases. In mid-2007, that shifted to a 50-50 ratio.

American Express is by no means the only lender to take such actions. Bank of America, Citi and Discover are among the major issuers who said they have done so as well. In the Federal Reserve survey, 20 percent of domestic banks reported having reduced credit limits for existing prime, or credit-worthy, borrowers. About 60 percent said they have cut limits for existing nonprime borrowers, and none reported raising lines for those customers.

Many card companies have had weak earnings, which they are responding to by raising interest rates on some borrowers, even as the Federal Reserve has slashed the federal funds rate.

According to CardRatings.com's database of credit card offers, the average interest rate was 13.8 percent on Nov. 4, up slightly from 13.75 percent on Oct. 15. That is a 1.27 percentage point decline from the average rate of 15.07 percent in the third quarter of last year. But given that the Fed has cut rates by a total of 3.25 percentage points (excluding the most recent cut of 0.5 percent late last month, which will probably not move card rates for a while), "clearly consumers haven't benefited from most of the rate cuts in the past year or so," said Arnold of CardRatings.com.

Most major banks base the annual percentage rates on their variable rate cards, which make up the majority of credit cards, on the prime rate, which is pegged to the federal funds rate. But how much and how soon they cut rates after a Federal Reserve action is up to them. And many have rate floors, or minimum rates they will charge, analysts and watchdogs said. "Many Chase customers have variable rates and for those customers, when a change is made to the prime rate, they may see their rate decrease or increase," said Jacobson of Chase Card Services.

But she said, "we may raise APRs and/or lower lines for customers who are showing signs of increased risk or inactivity." The opposite is also true, she said.

American Express started sending letters to customers this month, notifying them that rates on some cards would increase by 2 or 3 percentage points in December. "We're in a difficult economic environment with weaker credit quality among consumers and small businesses," said Desiree Fish, vice president of public affairs for the company.

But the Federal Reserve might step in to more closely monitor rate increases and other industry practices that consumers have long complained about. Congress has also proposed tighter regulations of the industry. President-elect Barack Obama said on the campaign trail that he supports credit card reforms.

In the meantime, borrowers should closely monitor their credit cards and credit reports, consumer advocates said.

First and foremost, pay your bills on time, not just on your credit cards but on all your debts. That means not falling behind on your mortgages or student loans. "You need to do everything you possibly can to keep your credit score as high as possible," said Bill Hardekopf, chief executive of LowCards.com.

Also keep your debt utilization as low as you can. If you want to avoid having your account shut, use your card every once in a while but pay it off right away. Make sure you check what fees you will be paying for certain transactions such as balance transfers. And keep a close watch on your credit limit.

"If that goes down, you stand the risk of really incurring fees," Hardekopf said. "You could blow by your limit and once you do that, not only will you instantly get an over-the-limit fee, but then you will most likely get hit with an APR increase, so that the cycle continues."

Friday, January 30, 2009

How to Win the Credit Score Game

By Liz Pulliam Weston
MSN Money

As mortgage rates tumble, many would-be buyers and refinancers are missing the chance to lock in loans at record lows. The reason? Their credit scores aren't high enough to qualify for the best rates and in some cases are too low to qualify for any loan at all.

Credit scores are three-digit numbers lenders use to gauge your creditworthiness, and in recent years a 720 FICO credit score was enough to get the best rates and terms. Even people with lower scores could get a decent deal, and at the peak of the lending boom it seemed no score was so low that it merited a rejection.

Talk back: Should credit-scoring companies be reined in?

These days, some lenders demand a 740 score for the best mortgage rates. Lower scores mean higher rates; if your scores are below 580, forget about it.

Missing out on what may be once-in-a-generation interest rates is painful enough. But less-than-stellar credit can hurt in other ways. After all, credit information is used:

By insurance companies to evaluate applicants and set premiums.

By landlords to decide who gets apartments.

By employers concerned about higher risk of theft from those with troubled finances.

Clearly, cultivating good credit scores is an essential 21st-century skill.

The good news is that it's possible to boost your numbers if you have a handle on your finances and you know how credit scores work. After all, the median credit score is 720 on the 300-to-850 FICO scale, meaning half the adult U.S. population has a higher score and half has a lower score. Forty percent have scores over 750, and 13% have scores above 800, according to Fair Isaac, the company that created FICO scoring. (You can get an idea of your relative standing with MSN Money's Credit Score Estimator; it uses Experian's Plus score ranges, which roughly align to FICO.)

Plenty of folks are handling their credit well enough to earn good scores. You can, too. But first you need to recognize that:

You can't raise your scores if your finances are still in free fall. If you're unable to pay your bills, you certainly can't fix your credit. Real credit score repair will have to wait until your financial crisis has been solved and you have enough money to cover your expenses, plus some extra to begin paying down your debts.

You can't raise your scores if you don't use credit. Credit scores try to predict how well you're likely to use credit in the future by how well you've used it in the past. So while living a cash-only lifestyle may do wonders for your wallet, it won't boost your scores -- in fact, without continuing use of some type of credit, eventually your credit reports won't even generate credit scores.

You don't have to pay credit card interest to achieve great scores. "Using credit" is not the same as "carrying a balance on your credit cards." Carrying a balance is expensive, bad for your finances and completely unnecessary. Many of us who have achieved 800-plus scores pay off our balances religiously, and we know you can build and keep great credit scores without ever paying a dime of credit card interest.

You can't expect overnight results. You're likely to see improvement in your scores within 30 days if you pay down significant chunks of your credit card debt. But otherwise, credit repair takes time, and how much time depends on the many details of your credit reports. If you have serious black marks, such as bankruptcies or foreclosures, you can see significant improvement in your scores as time passes but you may have to wait until those negatives drop off your credit reports before you can join the 700-Plus Club.

Now that you understand the basics, you can use the following techniques to get your scores over 740.

You have to nail the basics Patrol your credit reports. Your credit scores are based entirely on the information in your credit reports on file at the big three credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. If the information is wrong, your credit scores could suffer. You can get your reports once a year for free from the government-run AnnualCreditReport.com; you can buy subsequent copies directly from the bureaus or from MyFico.com. Dispute any serious errors, such as:

Accounts that aren't yours.

Reports of late payments when you paid on time.

Bankruptcies older than 10 years or accounts that were wiped out in bankruptcy but are listed as still due.

Other negative information that's older than seven years (the seven-year clock typically starts 180 days after the account first went delinquent).

Get a major credit card. Retail cards and gas cards can help you build your credit history initially, but to get your scores into 700-plus territory you'll want at least one big kahuna: Visa, MasterCard, Discover or American Express. If you can't qualify for a regular card, consider a secured version, for which you make a deposit with an issuing bank. Just make sure the card reports to all three bureaus and that it converts to a regular credit card after 12 to 18 months of on-time payments.

Arrange automatic payments for every card or loan. Credit scores are extraordinarily sensitive to whether you pay your bills on time, so don't let travel, a busy schedule or a simple brain fart trash your scores. Most lenders will let you set up automatic payments that take an amount you specify -- the minimum payment, a set dollar amount or the full balance -- every month from your checking account.

Don't let disputes go to collections. Yes, your insurance should have covered that bill; no, you shouldn't have to pay for a broadband connection that doesn't work. But if you let a commonplace problem like these escalate, your account will be turned over to collections and become a big black mark on your credit reports. Pay under protest and get your revenge in small claims court. (Don't get sued yourself, though: Lawsuits and judgments are another major stain on your credit reports.)

Give your limits a wide berth
Spread out your debt. More than a third of your FICO score depends on how much of your available credit you're using -- your so-called credit utilization. The FICO formula likes to see big gaps between your balances (whether you pay them off each month or not) and your limits, especially on credit cards. (You're rewarded for paying down installment debt, such as mortgages and auto loans, but your scores improve much more dramatically when you pay down revolving debt such as credit cards.) In short, it's better to have small balances on several cards than a big balance on one card.

A balance is a balance. You have to worry about your credit utilization ratio even if you pay your balances in full each month. The balance that's reported to the credit bureaus is typically the one on your last statement, not the balance that's left over after you pay your bill. So if you charge $9,000 on a $10,000 card, it's going to look like you're using 90% of your limit (which is really, really bad), even though you paid off the balance in full when you got the bill.

Shoot for 10%. The less of your available credit you use, the more FICO rewards you. Keeping your credit utilization below 30% on your cards is good; getting it below 10%is even better. If you regularly use more, ask for a higher limit, spread your charges out on more than one card or make two payments every month -- one just before your monthly statement closing date to lower the balance reported to the credit bureaus and a second one just before the due date to avoid late fees.

Push back against lower limits. Credit card issuers are reducing limits right and left; in fact, one banking analyst estimated that the newly risk-averse companies would slash $2 trillion of the $5 trillion in existing credit limits. This can be awful news for your credit scores, but you can and should try to push back. (Read "Thaw out your frozen credit" for details.) If you can't get the issuer to reverse its decision, move your balance elsewhere.

3 strategies for lowering utilization
Move debt to installment loans. If you've got high balances that you can't pay down quickly, consider transferring the debt to a personal installment loan. The interest rate you'll pay is typically higher -- 13% or so for people with good credit, compared with less than 10% on many credit cards -- but the scoring formula treats installment loan balances more kindly than the same debt on credit cards.

Or move debt off your credit reports entirely. You can make debt seem to disappear by paying it off with a loan from a friend, family member or retirement plan, none of which typically show up on your credit reports. If you're tempted to tap your retirement account, though, let me be clear: I am not a fan of 401(k) loans. Lose your job, and any unpaid balance can quickly become a tax nightmare. It's an especially bad idea if your finances are on the edge, because credit card debt can be erased in bankruptcy; 401(k) loans can't.

Play the home equity card cautiously. Moving a credit card balance to a home equity loan or line of credit may improve your scores but put you at greater overall financial risk. If you fail to pay the bill, you could lose your home. Also, as with a 401(k) loan, you're turning unsecured debt that could be wiped out in bankruptcy into secured debt that typically can't.

You need to have great credit to take advantage of today's lower interest rates. Liz Pulliam Weston shares some of her favorite tips.

Walk a fine line on plastic
Don't close accounts or let them be closed. Closing accounts can't help your scores and may hurt them. Yet many issuers these days are slamming shut inactive cards rather than continue to carry these unprofitable accounts. If you've got cards you haven't used in a while, take them out for dinner or a movie, and pay the balance promptly. Better yet, use them to charge a regular expense, such as your electric bill, and arrange for automatic payments.

Apply for credit sparingly. Applications for credit don't ding your scores as much as some people fear; typically, you lose five points or less. But when every point counts, such as when you're in the market for a mortgage or a car loan, you don't want to squander any of your scores. Wait to apply for any other credit until you've secured the loan you want.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Merrill chief Thain withdraws request for bonus



Merrill Lynch Chief Executive Officer, John Thain, poses before a news conference in Mumbai May 7, 2008. … WASHINGTON (AFP) – Troubled US bank Merrill Lynch said chairman and chief executive John Thain has withdrawn his request for a bonus this year amid rising public anger Wall Street's role in the country's financial crisis.

Thain, who took over Merrill Lynch a year ago, had reportedly suggested to company directors earlier that he be paid as much as 10 million dollars for his 2008 bonus even as the firm welcomed 10 billion dollars in federal assistance.

But at Monday's Merrill Lynch board meeting, Thain "requested that he receive no bonus for 2008" and four other executive officers made the same request saying it was the right step "given current economic and market conditions," the company said in a statement.

The company's compensation committee had been reluctant to grant Thain a major bonus, the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.

Morgan Stanley also has decided not to pay generous bonuses to its chief executive John Mack or some other top managers as the company struggles to recover amid layoffs and government aid, the Journal wrote on Tuesday. In addition, Morgan Stanley planned to slash compensation for the firm's top 35 executives by about 65 percent.

News report place Thain's annual salary at 750,000 dollars. He also reportedly received a 15 million dollar signing bonus when he was hired as Merrill Lynch's CEO last December, along with a pay package valued at between 50 million dollard and 120 million dollars over several years.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had condemned Thain's bonus request, saying the government's 700-billion-dollar bailout for Wall Street was designed to limit executive compensation and bonuses.

"While American families struggle to keep their jobs and their homes, I question the chutzpah of asking for a 10-million-dollar taxpayer-subsidized bonus," Reid said.

Merrill Lynch was forced to sell itself after making huge losses following the meltdown in the subprime, or higher risk, US mortgage market.

The acquisition of Merrill by Bank of America for 50 billion dollars averted a possible collapse of the 94-year-old company, saving shareholders billions of dollars and saving many jobs.

Other Wall Street firms, including Goldman Sachs, were also eliminating bonuses as the country faces the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

THEY EVEN HAD THE NERVE TO EVEN DEBATE WHY HE SHOULD RECIEVE THE MONEY (WOW!)

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Can Social Security Survive?

Ladies and Gents,

This is why the Money & Music Movement was created. The politicians, Big Corporate Bailouts, lack of education amongst the public, are all to blame. The time is now to begin the education process, to work with an expert and educate ourselves for our future. Cars are not an investment, Clothes are not an investment, Bar Tabs surely are not investment, unless we as a whole begin to educate ourselves and start doing the right things for our future, many of us may end up with those same clothes, living out of that same car, wishing those dollars so freely spent at the club were available for a cup of coffee, 2041.

Enjoy the reading!!

Can Social Security Survive? Retiring Minds Want To Know. Here Are Some Educated Guesses


Copyright 2008 Consumers Union of U.S., Inc.All Rights Reserved
Consumer Reports Money Adviser

December 2008

SECTION: Pg. 15 Vol. 5 No. 12

LENGTH: 802 words


HEADLINE: RETIREMENT GUY. CAN SOCIAL SECURITY SURVIVE? Retiring minds want to know. Here are some educated guesses.



Two Social Security-related questions seem to be on many minds these days: Will the program still be around when I retire? And will I get everything I have coming from it?

Nobody knows for sure, of course, but allow me to venture a couple of educated guesses, based on talking with experts and plowing through a pile of recent academic papers. To the first question: Probably. To the second one: Maybe, but I wouldn't bet my retirement on it.

There's no denying that the Social Security system has some problems, chief among them its ability to take in enough money to meet its future obligations. By the year 2041 payroll taxes will be sufficient to cover only 78 percent of promised benefits, according to the most recent report from the program's trustees.

Nonetheless, I've not heard a single credible expert propose that the U.S. do away with the system. Even privatizing it, the next worst thing in the opinion of many of us, seems far off the table these days. So I think we can reasonably assume that Social Security will still exist in some form, at least for those of us old enough now to be concerned about it.

But for the system to survive, it will either have to bring in more income or slow its spending. That could be done by raising taxes, reducing benefits, delaying the age at which we become eligible for benefits, or some combination of these.

My money is on delaying eligibility, which seems the most politically palatable option. And if we can get past the fact that it would mean reneging on a promise made to many of us from the day we first started paying into the system, it even has some logic to it.

A working paper published this summer by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) frames the argument this way: When the Social Security system started in 1935, the average 65-year-old retiree had a life expectancy of 12 more years; by 2004, that was up to 19 years. In other words, a system designed to support someone for a dozen years of retirement is now expected to do it for nearly 20.

The NBER calls this "age inflation" and goes on to calculate how eligibility ages might have been adjusted over time had that been taken into account. It concludes that the earliest age at which retirees can collect benefits, now 62, would have risen to between 65.6 and 67 by 2004. Normal, or "full," retirement age, now 66 to 67, would have risen to between 73 and 81.8.

This kind of thinking is likely to give Congress the cover it needs to consider fiddling with the eligibility ages. The politicians even have some precedent on their side. In 1983, the eligibility age for full benefits, long set at 65, was raised for those of us born after 1937, to its current range of 65 and two months to 67. WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU

If you're already retired or within a few years of it, I would guess that changing the eligibility ages won't affect you much. It's hard to imagine that Congress would act that quickly or cause such havoc in the lives of a cohort known to vote in substantial numbers. But if your retirement is decades off, be forewarned.

Some other ideas for pre-retirees:

* Know your best-case scenario. Because Social Security is unlikely to become more generous in the years ahead, consider the eligibility ages and benefit amounts it currently projects for you as the best you'll see and adjust your expectations down from there. You'll find your projected benefits in the statement Social Security sends out each year about 90 days before your birthday. Or you can use the recently unveiled online calculator at www.ssa.gov/estimator.

* Re-slice your pie chart. Most readers of this newsletter probably aren't looking to Social Security as their sole source of retirement income. It may be just one slice of your retirement pie, which could also include a traditional pension, a 401(k) plan, IRAs, non-retirement investments, and so forth. But consider what would happen if the Social Security slice were to get even smaller. You'd need to adjust your budget and plan to live on less, or start saving more aggressively.

* Think about your timing. Surveys have shown that many of us intend to postpone retirement and work longer. That's a good thing, because we may have no choice in the matter. If your dream is to retire at, let's say, age 62, you'd better plan on making that happen without early Social Security benefits, which may not be available to you until several years later.

Another reason to continue working, if you can, is to stay on an employer's health plan. Though you're currently eligible for Medicare at age 65 regardless of your "full" retirement age, that could be up for debate too. In fact, the NBER paper also adjusted Medicare for age inflation, calculating that as of 2004, people would have become eligible at ages 70 to 72. So try to stay healthy, and stay tuned.

LOAD-DATE: November 26, 2008

Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
Photobucket